How do we speak about the unspeakable? This is the foundational question of Being & Death. The search for an answer leads to the structure of this book: chains of analogy forming a circle around the unknown, gesturing toward the unspeakable through the negative space of allegory.
This diagram, which is visually and structurally similar to the Void Mandala, describes this process of circling1 the unknown. The idea is relatively simple: you can’t talk about the unspeakable, but you can outline its shape through analogy. The shape of the unspeakable becomes more robust the more analogies there are in your chain. When you ask the question, “What does every link in this chain have in common? What does the chain encircle?” Your answer is there in the negative space, the common thread connecting each analogy.
For instance, “superposition” is a model for non-duality in quantum mechanics. “Chiasm” is a model for non-duality in phenomenology. These two concepts, and many others that will be explored in Being & Death, become important to us since they can be used to form chain links in an analogy. Superposition is to chiasm insofar as they both articulate the space of non-duality, the space of “Both, and yet Neither.”
We talk about these concepts because they can be talked about. They exist in the realm of consciousness, in the realm of that-which-can-be-spoken. However, if we have enough of these analogies, we can form a metonymic chain that encircles the unknown. By understanding each element in the chain and understanding how their analogy works, we can come to understand the unspeakable space around which they circle. This is metapattern2.
This page shows how one can continue to zoom into the analogical chain, expanding the unknown. The goal is never complete knowledge, but rather absolute expansion of the unknown. This harkens back to Socrates, who is attributed with saying, “I know that I know nothing.” Which, if our goal is the unknowable, then this “nothing” is indeed what we’re after.
1. [This chain also calls to mind the numeral zero. The “0” both connotes a circle, which is infinity, and the emptiness at the center, which is nothing. The “Both, and yet Neither” of this infinity and this emptiness is what we’re after.]↩
2. [This is the void-level category from the Dance of Spirit post. If we want to understand the unspeakable, then we must understand all of the concepts that point toward the unknown.]↩